e-Government Acceptance Model During Covid-19 Crisis in Tainan City, Taiwan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v14i1.1861Keywords:
E-Government, Technology Acceptance Model, Covid-19Abstract
This research examines the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in implementing e-Government during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan. Furthermore, it builds government network infrastructure and develop Internet applications. Internet penetration as the first stage of this development began in 1998 and the second stage intends to promote the different services. The third phase simplifies information services to make them more proactive and accessible to the general population. In the fourth phase, e-government uses more Web 2.0 social networks to offer innovative services that actively address public needs. Finally, the fifth phase is projected to transform Taiwan into a smart nation with people-friendly services, an open, transparent, intelligent government, and evidence-based successful policies. The data were collected through a questionnaire survey on Tainan City’s users of E-Government services. Furthermore, structural model analysis was performed using smartPLS 3.0., while TAM measured the use of e-government. The results showed that the influential factors are perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and information quality. The system’s quality has no significant effect on the use of e-government in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic in Tainan City.
Keywords: E-Government, Technology Acceptance Model, COVID-19
Abstrak
Penelitian ini mengkaji Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) pada implementasi E-Government pada masa krisis covid-19 di Taiwan. Tahapan pengembangan e-government di Taiwan dimulai pada tahun 1998, yang menunjukkan tahap pertama yaitu penetrasi internet. E-government dimaksudkan untuk membangun infrastruktur jaringan pemerintah dan mengembangkan aplikasi internet: tahap kedua adalah tujuan e-government untuk mempromosikan layanan internet pemerintah. Kemudian fase ketiga, e-government, dimaksudkan untuk menyederhanakan layanan informasi menjadi proaktif dan mudah diakses oleh publik. Fase keempat, e-government menggunakan lebih banyak jejaring sosial Web 2.0 untuk menawarkan layanan inovatif yang lebih aktif memenuhi kebutuhan publik. Terakhir, e-government fase kelima diharapkan menjadi Taiwan yang cerdas, memberikan layanan yang nyaman bagi masyarakat, menerapkan pemerintahan yang terbuka, transparan, dan cerdas, serta mengoptimalkan kebijakan efektif berbasis bukti. Data untuk penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui survei kuesioner pada masyarakat Kota Tainan yang telah menggunakan layanan E-Government. Analisis model struktural dilakukan dengan menggunakan smartPLS 3.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan e-government di Kota Tainan dapat diukur dengan menggunakan Theory Acceptance Model. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan e-government di Kota Tainan adalah persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, persepsi manfaat, dan kualitas informasi. Sementara itu, kualitas sistem tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penggunaan e-government di era pandemi COVID-19 di Kota Tainan.
Kata Kunci: E-Government, Model Penerimaan Teknologi, COVID-19
Downloads
References
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lampis, A. (2020). Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: from onsite closure to online openness. Museum Management and Curatorship, 35(4), 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2020.1790029
Al Shibly, H., & Tadros, I. (2010). Employee’s perceptions towards electronic government in Jordan. European Journal of Scientific Research, 48(2), 169-176. http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm
Anggraini, A. T., & Iqbal, M. (2020). The Uttilization of Jogja Smart Service Application: an E-Readiness Approach. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 7(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.72130
Chan, F. K., Thong, J. Y., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Hu, P. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2010). Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. Journal of the association for information systems, 11(10), 519-549. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1976951
Dahi, M., & Ezziane, Z. (2015). Measuring e-government adoption in Abu Dhabi with technology acceptance model (TAM). International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(3), 206-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2015.071564
Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
ElKheshin, S. A., & Saleeb, N. (2020). Assessing the adoption of e-government using TAM model: case of Egypt. International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT), 12(1), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2020.12101
Fridayani, H. D., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Strategi Implementasi Intelligent Taiwan 2020 (Tahap ke 5 e-Government di Taiwan. Proceeding of The URECOL, 298-304. http://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/1041
Iqbal, M., Pribadi, U., & Elianda, Y. (2020). Factors affecting the citizen to use e-report application in Gunungkidul Regency. Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, 4(2), 27-39. https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/70
Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Urgensi Transformasi Pelayanan Publik melalui E-Government Pada New Normal dan Reformasi Regulasi Birokrasi. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(2), 220-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.220-231
Mat Dawi, N., Namazi, H., Hwang, H. J., Ismail, S., Maresova, P., & Krejcar, O. (2021). Attitude toward protective behavior engagement during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia: the role of e-government and social media. Frontiers in public health, 9, 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.609716
Sebetci, Ö. (2015). A TAM-based model for e-government: a case for Turkey. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(2), 113-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2015.069503
Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government. Parliamentary affairs, 54(1), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.88
Yang, T. M., Zheng, L., & Pardo, T. (2012). The boundaries of information sharing and integration: A case study of Taiwan e-Government. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S51-S60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.014
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information systems research, 16(1), 85-102. Technology Acceptance. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23015766
Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017). Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk. The Electronic Library, 35(1), 2–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/el-08-2015-0141
Yasir, A., Hu, X., Ahmad, M., Rauf, A., Shi, J., & Ali Nasir, S. (2020). Modeling impact of word of mouth and E-government on online social presence during COVID-19 outbreak: a multi-mediation approach. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(8), 2954. doi:b https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082954
