Implementation Of Infrastructure Policies to Support Safe and Sanitary Housing in Depok City Area

Dudi Mi’raz Imaduddin; Ismail Nurdin; Muchlis Hamdi; Hadi Prabowo; Kusworo Kusworo; Amelia Shafa Ath Thaariq

doi:10.33701/jtp.v15i2.3693

Dudi Mi’raz Imaduddin Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Ismail Nurdin Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Muchlis Hamdi Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Hadi Prabowo Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Kusworo Kusworo Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Amelia Shafa Ath Thaariq Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v15i2.3693

Keywords: Adequate and Safe Sanitation, Slum Area, Infrastructure

Abstract

Abstract

Depok City in an effort to create a clean, comfortable, safe and healthy area, it is necessary to form and organize a Healthy City. Depok City area, especially areas that have slum settlements, are polluted by polluted soil, water and the environment. This condition occurred in 73 areas where soil and water samples were taken for laboratory tests.In order to realize the implementation of Healthy Cities, it is necessary to support physical quality, social environment, changes in people's behavior through the active role of the community and the private sector as well as the Regional Government in a directed, coordinated, integrated and sustainable manner. The goal is to know about the implementation of Settlement Infrastructure Policy in Depok City, what are the inhibiting and supporting factors of the implementation, and what is the suitable implementation Model to achieve Proper and Safe Sanitation in Depok City Area. The method used is qualitative with data triangulation. The data were obtained from interviews conducted with beneficiaries of sanitation development, sub-district officials, sub-district officials, and officials assigned to the Depok City Government. The research findings indicate the implementation of Settlement Infrastructure Policy in Depok City exhibit a commendable level of overall adherence and garners a favorable response from the beneficiary community; sanitation development lacks public interest and funding, resulting in poor community facilities and limited awareness about clean sanitation; and the suitable model draws heavily from Grindle’s model.

Keywords: Adequate and Safe Sanitation; Infrastructure; Slum Area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Jamil, Li Ping Wong, Yan Piaw Chua, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal Hydrie, and Najeebullah Channa. 2022. ‘Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Situation in Primary Schools of Pakistan: The Impact of WASH-Related Interventions and Policy on Children School Performance’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(1):1259–77. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15681-w.

Akpabio, Emmanuel M., and John S. Rowan. 2021. ‘The Political Economy of Coordinating Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Management Policies and Programmes for Nigeria’. Water International 46(3):365–82. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2020.1867454.

Azwar, Azrul. 1990. Pengantar Ilmu Kesehatan Lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Mutiara Sumber Widya.

Bahtiar. 2006. ‘Kondisi Sanitasi Lingkungan Kapal Penumpang KM. Lambelu Miliki PT. PELNI’. Makassar: STIK Tamalatea.

Emil, S. 2018. Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia. Bandung: Unpad Press Graha Kandaga.

Grindle, Merilee S. 1980. Politics and Policy Implementation in The Third World. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Muanda, Christophe, Jacqueline Goldin, and Rainer Haldenwang. 2020. ‘Factors and Impacts of Informal Settlements Residents’ Sanitation Practices on Access and Sustainability of Sanitation Services in the Policy Context of Free Basic Sanitation’. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 10(2):238–48. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2020.123.

Scherer, Nathaniel, Islay Mactaggart, Chelsea Huggett, Pharozin Pheng, Mahfuj-ur Rahman, Adam Biran, and Jane Wilbur. 2021. ‘The Inclusion of Rights of People with Disabilities and Women and Girls in Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Policy Documents and Programs of Bangladesh and Cambodia: Content Analysis Using EquiFrame’. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(10):5087. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105087.

Taing, L. 2019. ‘Policy Implementation Considerations for Basic Services: A South African Urban Sanitation Case’. Water SA 45(4 October). doi: 10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i4.7533.

Ugwu, Paschaline Nkeiruka, Divine Ndubuisi Obodoechi, Agu Chukwuagoziem Samuel, and Ekeocha Davidmac Olisa. 2022. ‘Does Economic Policy in Nigeria Enhance Sustainable Water and Sanitation Facilities?’ Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 12(1):23–31. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2021.094.

Victral, Davi Madureira, and Léo Heller. 2021. ‘The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Brazilian States’. Water 13(2):228. doi: 10.3390/w13020228.

Wilbur, Jane, Nathaniel Scherer, Islay Mactaggart, Govind Shrestha, Thérèse Mahon, Belen Torondel, Shaffa Hameed, and Hannah Kuper. 2021. ‘Are Nepal’s Water, Sanitation and Hygiene and Menstrual Hygiene Policies and Supporting Documents Inclusive of Disability? A Policy Analysis’. International Journal for Equity in Health 20(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01463-w.