The Leadership Role in The Smart-Village Program in Banyuwangi District, East Java

  • Ella Lesmanawaty' Wargadinata IPDN
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v13i1.1429
Keywords: Digital service, Transformational Leadership, Digital Society, Openness

Abstract

The use of information communication technology (ICT) in government administration has changed the face of Weber's conventional bureaucracy into a modern model. The electronic or digital-based government model is an important milestone in this 21st century due to its ability to improve government performance, thereby increasing public satisfaction. The successful implementation of e-government is influenced by many beneficial and nonbeneficial determining factors, such as leadership. Therefore, this research aims to explore the leadership role of the Smart village program implemented in 2010 by the Banyuwangi District Government using a qualitative approach. Data were collected through observation in selected locations, interviews, and secondary sources. The data obtained were processed using the NVivo application process due to its ability to capture and build inductively concepts that describe research based on local perspectives. The results processed through the word cloud feature illustrate two interesting analyses. First Smart village is considered an online administration service by the Banyuwangi people because it is easy, fast, open, and full of certainty. Second leadership has 5 important roles, namely Charismatic, Innovative, Consistent, Cooperation, and Integrity. In conclusion, the success of e-government is strongly influenced by the usefulness of services for the community and the seriousness of the leadership to implement e-government not only as a political gimmick but to serve the community.

 

Keywords:  Digital service, Transformational Leadership, Digital Society, Openness

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2011). Politics of E-Government: E-Government and the Political Control of Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02225.x

Aycan, Z. (2002). Leadership and Teamwork in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1066

Aziiza, A. A., & Susanto, T. D. (2020). The Smart Village Model for Rural Area (Case Study: Banyuwangi Regency). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/722/1/012011

Baru, V. P., Djunaedi, A., & Herwangi, Y. (2019). Tahap Pengembangan Smart Kampung di Desa Ketapang Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Jurnal Planoearth. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpe.v4i2.1000

Basu, S. (2011). E-Government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

Camillo, C. A. (2017). Street-Level Bureaucracy. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_654-1

Carr, I., & Jago, R. (2014). Petty corruption, development and information technology as an antidote. Round Table. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2014.966495

Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005

Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004

Fazekas, M. (2017). Red tape, bribery and government favouritism: evidence from Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9694-2

Furuholt, Bjorn, & Fathul, W. (2008). E-government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: the Case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fathul_Wahid2/publication/224304005_E-Government_Challenges_and_the_Role_of_Political_Leadership_in_Indonesia_The_Case_of_Sragen/links/54e5af5c0cf276cec1747454.pdf

Furuholt, Bjørn, & Wahid, F. (2008). E-government challenges and the role of political leadership in Indonesia: The case of Sragen. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.134

Grohs, S., Adam, C., & Knill, C. (2016). Are Some Citizens More Equal than Others? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12439

Khasawneh, A. (2010). E-government and Jordan-led development. Electronic Government. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2010.030928

Kifle, H., & Cheng Patrick Low, K. (2009). E-Government Implementation and Leadership – The Brunei Case Study. Electronic Journal of E-Government.

Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002

Kurniawati, Y., & Pangayouw, B. J. C. (2017). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Alokasi Dana Kampung, Kebijakan Kampung dan Kelembagaan Kampung terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Studi pada Kampung Distrik Sentani Kabupaten Jayapura). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah.

Lee, Y., & Liu, W. K. (2011). Distinguishing Between Leaders and Leadership in Global Business. Journal of Global Business Management.

Li, Y., Castaño, G., & Li, Y. (2018). Linking leadership styles to work engagement: The role of psychological capital among Chinese knowledge workers. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2017-0108

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. In Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392554

Luk, S. C. Y. (2009). The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009

Napitupulu, D. (2017). A Conceptual Model Of E-Government Adoption in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.4.2518

Neill, M. O. (2013). The NVivo Toolkit. Na.

Novita, D. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Pengembangan E-Government: Studi Kasus Pemerintah Kota Palembang, Sumatera Selatan. Eksplora Informatika.

Ostermann, H., & Staudinger, R. (2011). Corruption, Transparency, and E-Government. In Electronic Government. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch023

Prahono, A., & Elidjen. (2015). Evaluating the Role e-Government on Public Administration Reform: Case of Official City Government Websites in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.334

Prybutok, V. R., Zhang, X., & Ryan, S. D. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.12.004

Rahardjo, E., Mirchandania, D., & Joshia, K. (2007). E-Government Functionality and Website Features: A Case Study of Indonesia. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 10(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2007.10856437

Rokhman, A. (2013). E-Government Adoption in Developing Countries: The Case of Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and E-Governance. https://doi.org/http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.302.973

S. A. Nawafleh, R. F. Obiedat, O. K. H. (2012). E-government Between Developed And Developing Countries. IJAC, 5(1–13). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v5i1.1887

Sekarsari, R. W., & Winarno, T. (2018). Smart Kampung Sebagai Wujud Kemajuan Sesitem Administrasi Dan Manajemen Di Desa Ketapang, Kecamatan Kalipuro, Kabupaten Banyuwangi. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations). https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v2n2.p82-87

Setiawan P, T., Octawirani, P., & Perdana W, I. (2016). Kajian Model Akselerasi Pelayanan Desa Terintegrasi Melalui Program Smart Kampung Di Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Pemberdayaan Dan Inovasi Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah Dan Desa.

Setiawan, T. (2016). INOVASI DAERAH DALAM AKSELERASI PELAYANAN DESA. In PEMBERDAYAAN DAN INOVASI TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH DAN DESA.

Sheryazdanova, G., & Butterfield, J. (2017). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy in Kazakhstan. Journal of Information Technology and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1275998

Shouran, Z., Priyambodo, T. kuntoro, & Nur, R. (2019). eGovernment Transformation: Literature Review. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(6), 208–212. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333869052_eGovernment_Transformation_Literature_Review

Sosiawan, E. A. (2017). Evaluasi Implementasi E-Government Pada Situs Web Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia: Prespektif Content Dan Manajemen. Seminar Nasional Informatika. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2011.06.029

Stewart, J. (2006). Instructional and Transformational Leadership: Burns, Bass and Leithwoood. Journal of Educational Administration.

Tozer, J. (2012). Leading Through Leaders: Driving Strategy, Execution and Change. In Leading Through Leaders.

Trapero, F. G. A., & De Lozada, V. M. (2010). Differences between the relationship of integrity and leadership styles according to the model of Bernard Bass. Estudios Gerenciales. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(10)70102-9

Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. In Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui021

Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.865

Yunita, N. P., & Aprianto, R. D. (2018). Kondisi Terkini Perkembangan Pelaksanaan E-government Di Indonesia : Analisis Website. SENTIKA 2018, 329–336.

Zhang, X., Prybutok, V. R., Ryan, S. D., & Sharp, J. H. (2008). A leadership knowledge management model for E-government: A preliminary empirical test. 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008.

Zhao, X., & Xu, H. D. (2015). E-Government and Corruption: A Longitudinal Analysis of Countries. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942736

Published
2021-08-18
How to Cite
Wargadinata, E. (2021). The Leadership Role in The Smart-Village Program in Banyuwangi District, East Java. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 13(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v13i1.1429