The Analysis of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) Management Using Interpretive Structural Modeling

A Case Study at BUMDes Niagara, Bandung Regency

  • Agni Grandita Permata Sari Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Keywords: BUMDes Management, Interpretive Structural Modeling, Village Original Income

Abstract

The Central Government and West Java Province are intensively issuing policies to increase village empowerment, especially since village funds were distributed in 2015. Although these funds have positive implications for increasing the number of BUMDes, in general, the impact of BUMDes has not been too significant for the increase of the village's original income (PADes). West Java Province as a province that is very aggressively launching programs for villages development does not have BUMDes with ‘Big’ and ‘Advanced’ status, and only one with ‘Mature’ status, namely BUMDes Niagara in Bandung Regency. This paper aims to know the management, to identify and to analyze the most influential actors, supporting and inhibiting factors, and the changes expected to improve the management of BUMDes Niagara in Bandung Regency. The method used is qualitative with an inductive approach. Data analysis used the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method. The results showed that the management of BUMDes Niagara was elitist in that the village head and BUMDes manager played a major role in the development of BUMDes. Furthermore, the constraint analysis shows that the low quality of human resources is the most dominant problem. On the other hand, the factor of village potential and the commitment of the village head are the supporting factors that are most decisive. The above conditions converge on the need for the involvement of other parties, especially the government in providing guidance and assistance to Niagara BUMDes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. BUMDes Niagara. (2020). Profil BUMDes Niagara 2020.
2. Chandramowli, S. (2011). Analysis of barriers to development in landfill communities using interpretive structural modeling. Habitat International, 35, 246–253.
3. Desa Wangisagara. (2020). Profil Desa Wangisagara.
4. DPM Prov Jawa Barat. (2020). Data BUMDes Provinsi Jawa Barat 2020.
5. Fathudin, Tharim, A., & Ihya, N. H. (2020). Patronase, Klientelisme Dan Politik Identitas Dalam Perhelatan Demokrasi Akar Rumput.
6. Firman. (2021). Ini Hasil Dana Desa Sejak 2015. Kemendes PDTT.
7. Hamidi, H., Setijonegoro, F. N., Fujitriartanto, Sa’id, A., Harioso, Huda, & Hardiyanto, A. (2015). Indeks Desa Membangun. Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi.
8. Ihsan, A. N. (2018). Analisis Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) Gerbang Lentera Sebagai Penggerak Desa Wisata Lerep. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 7(04), 221–230.
9. Jubaedah, R. S. (2020). 20 Persen BUMDes di Jabar Tidak Eksis, Masalah pada Akses Pemasaran. Tribunnews Jabar.
10. Jurdi, F. (2019). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Kencana.
11. Kemendesa. (2020). BUMDes di Indonesia.
12. Nur, M. A. (2011). Memahami Perkembangan Desa Indonesia. Academica, 03(2), 647.
13. Phahlevy, R. R. (2016). The Concept of Village Autonomy in Indonesia (Indonesian Constitution Perspective). Rechtsidee, 3(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v3i1.151
14. Ramadana, C. B., Ribawanto, H., & Suwondo. (2010). Keberadaan badan usaha milik desa (BUMDES) sebagai penguatan ekonomi desa (studi di desalandungsari,kecamatan dau,kabupaten malang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 1(6), 1068–1076.
15. Sianipar, M. (2012). Penerapan Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Dalam Penentuan Elemen Pelaku Dalam Pengembangan Kelembagaan Sistem Bagi Hasil Petani Kopi dan Agroindustri Kopi. Agrointek, 6(1), 8–15.
16. Suryanto, R. (2018). Peta Jalan BUMDes Sukses. PT.Syncore Indonesia.
17. Wasistiono, S. (2019). Sejarah, Kedudukan, Serta Prospek Perangkat Desa di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja, 09(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jiwbp.v9i1.339
18. Wronka, M. (2013). Analyzing The Success of Social Enterprise-Critical Success Factors Perspective, Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management and Innovation. MakeLearn 2013. Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4927.6009
19. Yusuf, M. (2020). Decision Support System di Era 4.0 Teori & Aplikasi Tool Analysis. IPB Press.
20. Zarkasi, A. (2018). Pengelolaan Dan Pemanfaatan Dana Desa Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik (JISIP), 2(1), 87. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jisip/article/view/7323
Published
2021-07-18
How to Cite
Sari, A. (2021). The Analysis of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) Management Using Interpretive Structural Modeling. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 13(1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v13i1.1555