DIMENSI PENGUKURAN KUALITAS HIDUP DI BEBERAPA NEGARA

Authors

  • Jamaruddin Jamaruddin Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri Kampus Sulawesi Selatan
  • Sudirman Sudirman Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri Kampus Sulawesi Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61076/jpp.v4i1.2640

Keywords:

measurement, quality of life

Abstract

The measurement of quality of life is different because there is no concept of quality of life agreed
upon by experts because quality of life is seen as complex and does not apply as a whole, including
cultural factors. Therefore, to determine the quality of life of a country, United Nation Development
Program (UNDP) measures the quality of life through the Human Development Index (HDI), which
measures the quality of life objectively, however, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the
Happiness Index has tend to measure the quality of life subjectively. This discussion tries to reveal
the dimensions in measuring the quality of life such as government organizations, international
institutions including the results of research by experts in various countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australian Well-being Index (AWI) (2015).
NAB Australian Wellbeing Index – QA
2015. How Australians assess the quality
of their lives. by NAB Behavioural &
Industry Economics (Group Economics).
http://business.nab.com.au/wp-content/
uploads/2016/03/Wellbeing-Report-Q4-
2015-final.pdf.
Azahan, Awang; Abdul Samad, Hadi;
Jamaluddin, Md Jahi; Asmah, Ahmad
& Abdul Hadi, Harman Shah. (2006).
Mendifinisi Semula Makna Kualiti
Hidup Masyarakat Bandar Dalam
Konteks Ilmu Sosial. Malaysian Journal
of Environmental Management. 7, 19-32.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Sosial
dan Kependudukan. http://www.bps.
go.id/tab_sub/view.php?kat=1&tabel.
Baris, K.Y and Osman, Z. (2003). Measuring
the quality of life in European union.
The Case of Turkey as a Candidate,
International Journal of Social Economic.
30 (11) 1162-1176.
CIA World Factbook (2022). Explore All
Countries-Turkey. Middle East. Di ambil
pada tanggal 3 April 2022 dari https://
www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/
countries/turkey/.
Dalia, S. and Algirdas, J. (2009). The Concept
of life and Happiness-Correlation and
Differences. Engineering Economic. (3),
58-66.
Dalia, A. and Juozas, R. (2007). Quality of
life and its Components’ Measurement.
Engineering Economics. 2 (52), 44-49.
Lyndon,N.;Bustami,M.R. and Salfarina,A.G.
(2011). “Persepsi Kualitas Hidup
Komunitas Bidayuh: Kajian Perbandi-ngan
antara Peserta dan Bukan Peserta Program
(Skema Pembangunan Kasusejahteraan
Rakyat) di Daerah Serian, Serawak.
Journal of Society and Space 7Special
Issue: Social and Spatial Challenges of
Malaysian Development (91 – 104).
Malaysia Well-Being Report (MWI) (2013).
Economic Planning Unit Prime
Minister’S Departement Putrajaya. di
ambil bulan November 2013. http://
www.epu.gov.my/en/krm2013.
Michael, R.H. (1999). Testing Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality
of Life Across Time. Social Indicators
Research. 46 (3), 249-271.
UNDP. (2022). Human Development Index
(HDI). Di dapat melalui https://hdr.undp.
org/en/content/human-developmentindex-hdi pada tanggal 31 maret 2022.
UNDP. (2022). Sustainable Development
Goals. Di dapat melalui https://www.undp.
org/sustainable-development-goals?.
Undang-undang Dasar (UUD) 1945 beserta
dengan Perubahanannya. (2014).
Educative Presindo. Bandung.
Undang-undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1992
tentang Perkembangan kependudukan
dan Pembangunan Keluarga Sejahtera.
Ventegodt, S.; Merrick, J. and Andersen, N.J.
(2003). Quality of Life Theory I. The
IQOL Theory: An Integrative Theory of
the Global Quality of Life Concept. The
Scientific World Journal, 3, 1030-1040.
WHO (2022). WHOQOL: Measuring Quality
of Life. Didapat melalui https://www.
who.int/tools/whoqol pada tanggal 31
maret 2022.

Downloads

Published

Apr 1, 2022

How to Cite

Jamaruddin, J., & Sudirman, S. (2022). DIMENSI PENGUKURAN KUALITAS HIDUP DI BEBERAPA NEGARA. Jurnal Pallangga Praja (JPP), 4(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.61076/jpp.v4i1.2640

Issue

Section

Articles