Desentralisasi Pelayanan Publik Melalui Representasi UPTD Dukcapil untuk Meningkatkan Aksesibilitas di Wilayah Terpencil
Kata Kunci:
decentralization, public service, Dukcapil, UPTD, remote areas, accessibilityAbstrak
This study analyzes the implementation of public service decentralization through the representation of the Population and Civil Registration Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD Dukcapil) in improving the accessibility of civil registration services in remote areas. Using a qualitative case study approach at the UPTD Dukcapil of Merlung Subdistrict, Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldana’s interactive model. The findings show that the reactivation of the UPTD after the deactivation of the Machine to Machine (M2M) network significantly increased public access to civil registration services, recording 133 services in three operational days, dominated by e-ID card (e-KTP) registrations. Merlung’s strategic location positions it as a service hub for surrounding and neighboring districts. However, challenges persist, including logistical shortages, power outages, and limited local authority due to the unit’s subordination to the regency’s civil registration office. The study concludes that decentralization through UPTD effectively reduces spatial barriers and service disparities but requires stronger resource support, institutional coordination, and a balanced policy between national standardization and local responsiveness.
Keywords: decentralization, public service, Dukcapil, UPTD, remote areas, accessibility.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abimbola, S., Baatiema, L., & Bigdeli, M. (2019). The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: A realist synthesis of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning, 34(8), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz055
Anggraini, A., Apriliani, E., Sari, P. A., Danti, R. R., & Prasetyo, E. (2022). Penerapan Prinsip Good Governance dalam Pelayanan Publik Online Sobat Dukcapil Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Publik, 18(2).
Bennouna, C., Feldman, B., Usman, R., Adiputra, R., Kusumaningrum, S., & Stark, L. (2016). Using the Three Delays Model to examine civil registration barriers in Indonesia. PLoS ONE, 11(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168405
Darmawan, E., Baim, B., Sanu, J. A. M., & Suthiar, S. (2024). Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik di Daerah Terpencil (Studi Implementasi Standar Pelayanan Minimal di Distrik Agats, Kabupaten Asmat, Papua Selatan). Community Engagement and Emergence Journal (CEEJ), 6(4).
Fadhil, M., & Ilham, M. (2019). Peranan Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Dalam Mengoptimalisasi Pelayanan Gerakan Indonesia Sadar Administrasi Kependudukan (Gisa) Di Kota Bandung Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Registratie, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33701/jurnalregistratie.v1i1.827
Fitriana, A. R. D. (2024). Analisis Inovasi Roti 7 Lapis (Response Time 7 Menit Layanan Pemadaman Kebakaran Gratis) Di Kota Surabaya Dalam Perspektif New Public Service. MAP (Jurnal Manajemen Dan Administrasi Publik), 7(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.37504/map.v7i3.651
Hujriman, M. H. (2023). Desentralisasi Pelayanan Publik di Bidang Administrasi Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Masyarakat di Kabupaten Bombana. Muadalah: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2).
Jayanthi, R., & Dinaseviani, A. (2022). The Digital Gap and Solutions Implemented in Indonesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. JURNAL IPTEKKOM Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, 24(2), 187–200.
Lembaga Administrasi Negara, P. K. K. O. D. (2019). Evaluasi kinerja penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik di daerah otonom: Studi disparitas antar wilayah. LAN Press.
Lestari, R. A., & Santoso, A. (2022). Pelayanan Publik Dalam Good Governance. JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL Dan ILMU POLITIK, 2(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v2i1.2134
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Noor, I. (2016). Determinas{i} Pelayanan Publik Pemerintahan Daerah: Paradoks di Era Desentralisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2(4), 1–17.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bh6zAAAAIAAJ
Puspawati, A. A. (2016). Penerapan New Public Management (NPM) di Indonesia: Reformasi Birokrasi, Desentralisasi, Kerjasama Pemerintah dan Swasta Dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(1).
Ramadhan, A. H. R., & Yusuf, H. (2025). Implementasi Desentralisasi dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Layanan Publik di Pemerintahan Daerah. Wacana: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Interdisiplin, 12(1), 54–66.
Sanga, C., Kabadi, G., Karugendo, E., de Savigny, D., Cobos Muñoz, D., & Adair, T. (2020). Decentralization of birth registration to Local Government in Tanzania: the association with completeness of birth registration and certification. Global Health Action, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1831795
Setiawan, F. (2022). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil Kabupaten Barito Selatan. Jurnal Mediasosian: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 6(1).
Sihombing, S., Panjaitan, M., Pasaribu, J., & Rajagukguk, J. (2025). Analisis Penerapan Identitas Kependudukan Digital (Ikd) Berdasarkan Permendagri No 72 Tahun 2022 Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus: Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Dairi). GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal Dan Pembangunan, 11(3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.56015/gjikplp.v11i3.381
Simatauw, R. W., & Malau, F. (2025). Transformasi Pelayanan Publik: Mewujudkan Inovasi Dan Efisiensi Di Kantor Dukcapil Kabupaten Merauke. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu …, 12, 130–143.
