DEKONSTRUKSI INDEPENDENSI KPK PASCA-REVISI UU NO. 19 TAHUN 2019: ANALISIS POLITIK HUKUM DAN PENANGANAN KORUPSI PEJABAT EKSEKUTIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33701/jppdp.v18i2.5708Keywords:
KPK; independensi; komparatif; pejabat eksekutif; revisi UU KPKAbstract
The revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law through Law No. 19 of 2019 has sparked serious debate regarding the weakening of the institution and the erosion of the KPK's independence, particularly in handling corruption cases involving executive officials. This article aims to analyze how the KPK's independence has been reconstructed after the revision and how this is reflected in law enforcement practices. The analysis was conducted on a number of strategic decisions, including the cases of Edhy Prabowo, Juliari Batubara, Syahrul Yasin Limpo, and Lukas Enembe, which show indications of structural and procedural weakening, as well as inconsistencies in the judicial and criminal justice processes. A comparison is made with the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) model in Hong Kong, which has proven highly effective thanks to guaranteed institutional independence, operational transparency, and active community involvement in corruption prevention. The results of the study show that after the revision, the independence of the KPK has experienced a shift in the political direction of law enforcement in combating corruption in Indonesia, structural weaknesses reflected in procedural interventions, changes in investigation patterns, and inconsistencies in verdicts against high-level corruption perpetrators, as well as a spirit of independence that is vulnerable to political intervention. This article recommends reinforcing the legal framework that guarantees the KPK's operational independence and conducting a systemic evaluation of political influence in
Downloads
References
Agus Riewanto, Andy Omara, et. al. (2023). Hukum Tata Negara.
Anandya, D., & Kaban, L. E. (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Vonis 2022 Menurunnya performa kerja Mahkamah Agung. Indonesia Corruption Watch, 5–7.
Ari, M. A. A. (2022). Kedudukan Kpk Sebagai Lembaga Negara Dalam Persfektif Konsep Trias Politica. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i1.51
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Sekretaris Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, hlm.203.
Baleg. (2019). Naskah Akademis RUU Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 3, 1–63.
Claritha Delia Lohanda, C. S. T. K. (2024). Hukum Acara Pidana dalam Kasus Korupsi di Kementrian Pertanian dengan tersangka. Kewarganegaraan, 8(2), 1487–1493.
Edbert, F., Tundjung, D., & Sitabuana, H. (2022). Keuangan Negara Dan Kerugian Negara Di Indonesia Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Serina Iv Untar 2022, 513–522.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2024a). Laporan-Evaluasi Kinerja KPK 2019-2024. Pusat Studi Hukum & Kebijakan Indonesia.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2024b). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Vonis 2023. Indonesia Corruption Watch, 1–51.
Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2021). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Vonis Tahun 2021. 85–86.
Indrayana, D. (2016). Jangan Bunuh KPK Korupsi Pemberantasan Korupsi. In Intrans Publishing Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW) PuKAT Korupsi UGM. Intrans Publishing.
Kurniawan, A., & Suhadi, S. (2024). Pemikiran Mahfud Md Terkait Politik Hukum Dan Penerapan Tertib Hukum Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Kelsenian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(5), 1610–1617. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2557
MD, M. (2001). Politik Hukum di Indonesia (p. 9). LP3ES.
Menkumham. (2019). Penjelasan atas UU No. 19 Tahun 2019. 6409, 11.
Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Teori Hukum. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Munawar, S. (2025). Ratio Legis Konsep Pemidanaan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Koruptor Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Law, Development and Justice Review, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.1-19
Muntoha, M. (2009). Demokrasi Dan Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss3.art4
Orba Manullang, S., Kusumadewi, Y., Kristian Siburian, H., Siburian, H., & Sipayung, B. (2023). Problematika Hukum atas Pembentukan Perubahan Kedua atas UU KPK. Journal on Education, 05(02), 4885–4897.
Peter Allan Commissioner. (1992). Fifth International Anti-Corruption Conderence Amsterdam Empirical Knowledge On Strategies For Corruption Control. In Idependent Commission Against Corruption Hong Kong (Vol. 120, Issue 11, p. 259). Idependent Commission Against Corruption Hong Kong.
Pranoto, D. S., & Kurniawan, T. (2023). Tiga tahun reformasi kelembagaan komisi pemberantasankorupsi: Sebuah analisis narasi kebijakan. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 151–164.
Putra Astomo. (2018). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Rajawali Press.
Putusan Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009, 19 Mahkamah Konstitusi RI 19 (2009).
Ramadhana, K., & Oktaryal, A. (2020). Laporan Penelitian Proyeksi Masa Depan Pemberantasan Korupsi Menelisik Pengesahan Revisi Undang-Undang KPK. Icw, 68.
Riza Sirait, & Ismaidar Ismaidar. (2024). Politik Hukum Kedudukan KPK Sebagai Lembaga Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i1.3346
Robin, P., & Giroth, I. R. (2023). Pusaran Post-Truth Loyalis Gubernur Papua Lukas Enembe dalam Kasus Korupsi. MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v2i2.1593
Samosir, D. (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang Menyebabkan Materi Muatan Undang-Undang Bertentangan Dengan UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 773. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1246
Saragi, P., & Washington Hasiholan, A. (2025). Peranan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk) Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Honeste Vivere, 35(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v35i1.430
Selfi Suriyadinata, & Ananda Putra Rezeki. (2022). Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Ketatanegaraan. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v3i2.81
Studi, P., Hukum, I., Hukum, F., & Ganesha, U. P. (2025). Efektivitas Hukuman Pidana dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Korupsi : Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia dan China Anak Agung Bagus Adhita Mahendra Putra. 2.
Syamsudin Radjab. (2021). Konfigurasi Politik dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Nagamedia.
Transparency Internasional Indonesia. (2023). Evaluasi Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi 2019-2023. Tii.
Trie, N., Dewi, A., Sultan, U., Banten, M. H., Syech, J., Al-Bantani, N., Sukawana, K., Curug, K., & Serang, K. (2025). Peran KPK Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(April), 63–69.
Umam, A. K. (2019). Lemahnya Komitmen Antikorupsi Presiden di Antara Ekspektasi Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Tekanan Oligarki. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(2), 1–17.
Undang-undang. (2019). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan tindak Pidana Korupsi. In JDIH. https://doi.org/10.15642/politique.2022.2.1.45-53
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pengesahan United Natlons Convention Against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Anti Korupsi, 2003), BPK RI 1.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pengesahan United Natlons Convention Against Corruption, 1999 JDIH 1 (2006).
Wong, C., & Introduction, I. (1973). Anti-Corruption Measures of the Independent Commission Against Corruption , Hong Kong Special Administration Region , China and Strategies and Experience of Its Community Relations Department. 145–153.
Xu, J., & Xu, J. (2024). Differential public support and the independence of anti-corruption agencies. European Political Science Review, 16(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000231
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 NOVI ENJELINA PUTRI, Muhaimin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
