Trend On Public Administration Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
This research aims to present publications on Public Administration from the Scopus database using a bibliometric analysis. The Publish or Perish method by Harzing was used for citations in the form of metrics, while Microsoft Excel and VOS viewer were used for frequency analysis and visualization of data between 2010-2021. Findings: Based on the results, the publications on Public Administration have consistently increased since 2015 with 656 citations. The most popular keywords identified are development, drug administration, food and practice, China, impact, review and state, application, research, big data, future and Public Administration, case, evolution, and efficiency.
Keywords: Public Administration; Bibliometric Analysis
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan publikasi tentang Public Administration dari database Scopus dengan menggunakan analisis bibliometrik. Metode penelitian melalui Publish or Perish oleh Harzing digunakan untuk kutipan dalam bentuk metrik, sedangkan Microsoft Excel dan VOS viewer digunakan untuk analisis frekuensi dan visualisasi data antara 2010-2021. Temuan: Berdasarkan hasil, publikasi Administrasi Publik secara konsisten meningkat sejak tahun 2015 dengan 656 kutipan. Kata kunci yang paling populer diidentifikasi adalah pengembangan, administrasi obat, makanan dan praktik, Cina, dampak, tinjauan dan status, aplikasi, penelitian, data besar, masa depan dan Administrasi Publik, kasus, evolusi, dan efisiensi.
Kata Kunci: Administrasi Publik; Analisis Bibliometrik
Downloads
References
Ahmi, A. & Mohamad, R., (2019), “Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on Web accessibility”, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 250-258. https://aidi-ahmi.com/download/2019%20-%20IJRTE_Ahmi%20&%20Rosli.pdf
Akhavan, P., Ebrahim, N.A., Fetrati, M.A. & Pezeshkan, A. (2016), “Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study”, Scientometrics, Vol. 107 No. 3, pp. 1249-1264, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x
Arias, M.I, Guerrazzi, L.A.C, & Serra, F.A.R., (2016), Dimensiones preliminares para un modelo de valor de la tecnología de la información en el sector público. Costa do Sauípe, Brasil. En RIDCA. https://www.academia.edu/28582375/DIMENSIONES_PRELIMINARES_PARA_UN_MODELO_DE_VALOR_DE_LA_TECNOLOG%C3%8DA_DE_LA_INFORMACI%C3%93N_EN_EL_SECTOR_P%C3%9ABLICO
Bouckaert, G., (2010), Research in Public Administration For The Future, Society and Economy, Vol. 32, No. 1, 3-15, Akadémiai Kiadó. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41472143
Cameron, R., & McLaverty, L., (2008), Public Administration research in South Africa An assessment of journal publications, 1994–2006, Administratio Publica, Volume 15 No 2. https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/14710
Cervantes, P.A.M., Matinez, M.C.P., & Rambaud, S.C., (2021). Public Administration: A Bibliometric Research. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4260-1
Chadegani, A.A., Mohamed, Z.M., & Jari, A., (2011), The Determinant Factors of Auditor Switch among Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 80. 158-168. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2227597
Davy, T.J., 1962, Public Administration as a Field of Study in the United States, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Volume: 28 issue: 1, page(s): 63-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002085236202800109
De Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34
Devos, R., (2011), Research and Bibliometrics: A Long History. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Volume 35, Issue 5, May, 336-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2011.04.008
Donthu, N. Kumar, S. Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M., (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Henry, N., (1989) public administration and public affairs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall International
Hinojosa, N., & Hernández, A. B., (2022), An Approach to the Paradigms of Public Administration in Ecuador, from a Purely Bibliometric Study. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 84-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.101007
Kovač, P., & Jukić, T., (2016). Development of Public Administration and its Research in Slovenia through the Lenses of Content Analysis of the International Public Administration Review. International Public Administration Review. 14. 75-114. https://doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2016.1.04
Marques, T.M.G., Reis, N.R., & Serra, F.A.R. (2020), Bibliometrics in Public Administration. In: Farazmand A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham
Moed, H., Luwel, M., & Nederhof, A.J.. (2002). Towards Research Performance in the Humanities. Library Trends. 50(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ650928
Ni, C., Sugimoto, C.R. & Robbin, A. (2017), Examining the Evolution of the Field of Public Administration through a Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration Review . Public Admin Rev, 77: 496-509. https://chaoqunni.github.io/papers/par.pdf
Pambayun, K. G., (2021). Digital Libraries during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis and Information Mapping. Indonesian Journal of Librarianship. 2 (1), pp.17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33701/ijolib.v1i2.1416
Russell, J.M., & Rousseau, R., (2015), Bibliometrics and Institutional Evaluation, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c15/e1-30-04-04.pdf
Sweileh, W.M., Al-Jabi, S.W., AbuTaha, A.S. et al. (2017), Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile - health: 2006–2016. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0476-7
Velasco, B., Bouza, J.M.E., Pinilla, J.M., Roman, J.A.S. (2012). La utilizacion de los indicadores bibliometricos para evaluar la actividad investigadora. Aula abierta, 40 (2), 75–84. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3920967
White J. D., (1999), The Narrative Foundations of Public Administration Washington: Georgetown University Press
Vogel, R., (2014), What Happened to the Public Organization? A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration and Organization Studies, The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 44(4) 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012470867
Yang, L., (2019), Public Administration as a Dynamic Balance and Integrative Science Across Politics, Management, and Law: Rosenbloom’s Framework and Chinese Experiences, American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 49(1) 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018759337
Yu, Z., (2022), Development of Public Administration Research with a Bibliometric Analysis, Hindawi Scientific Programming. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4959930
