TRAJEKTORI HUBUNGAN NEGARA DAN MASYARAKAT DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK
Abstract
Perkembangan reformasi administrasi publik lambat laun berubah seiring pekembangan zaman dan semakin kompleksnya kebutuhan masyarakat akan pelayanan publik. Perkembangan yang ada telah membawa implikasi terhadap penyelenggaraan peran administrasi publik. Proses transformasi dari globalisasi pada abad 20 sampai 21 bisa dipahami sebagai evolusi dan modernisasi administrasi maupun manajemen publik, terjadinya penguatan atas demokratisasi atas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan seperti juga munculnya konsep governance, serta perubahan struktur institusi pemerintahan yang mengedepankan prinsip kerjasama maupun partnership antar dan inter organisasi publik maupun jaringan dengan organisasi non-publik dengan tujuan utama adalah memperkuat kapasitas publik untuk mengambil peran dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan.
Kata kunci : Trajektori, Pelayanan publik, Administrasi publik
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, Daron dan James. A Robinson. 2014. Mengapa Negara Gagal: Awal mula kekuasaan, Kemakmuran dan Kemiskinan. Elex Media Komputindo.
Bayart, J-F. (2009).The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bevir, M. 2010. Democratic Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: New Jersey.
Denhardt, R.B.; Denhardt, J.V., 2007; The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering; Armonk, New York/London, England; M.E. Sharpe
Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow and J. Tinkler (2006). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 16, No. 3 , pp. 467-494.
Goldfinch, S. and J. Wallis. 2010. Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform, Public Administration 88(4): 1099–1115.
Kahin, George Mc Turnar. 2013. Nasionalisme dan Revolusi di Indonesia. Komunitas Bambu: Depok.
Latief, Yudi. 2014. Mata Air Keteladanan: Pancasila dalam Perbuatan. Mizan: Jakarta.
Lodge, M. and D. Gill. 2011. Toward a new Era of Administrative Reform? The myth of post-NPM in New Zealand. Governance 24(1): 141–166.
Marinetto, M. 2003. Governing Beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School.Political Studies 51(3): 592–608
McCourt, W. (2013). Models of Public Service Reform: A Problem-Solving Approach. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6428. Washington D.C: The World Bank. Available from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/04/30/000158349_20130430082936/Rendered/PDF/wps6428.pdf
Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Weak State, Strong Societies: State-Society Relation and State Capability in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Osborne, S., 2006; The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3),p.377-387.
Osborne, S. (ed.), 2010; The New Public Governance; London & New York: Routledge.
Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor and G. Nasi (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Towards a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 135-158.
O’Flynn, J. 2007. From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implication. Australian Journal of Public Administration. Volume 66 Number 3.
Sampson, Steven. 2002. Weak States, Uncivil Socities and Thousand of NGO’s. Lund University Press: Sweden.
Sjoberg, Fredrik M. 2007. Competitive Election in Authoritarian States: Weak States, Strong Elites and Fractional Societies. Uppsala Universitet.
Warren, M. E. 2009. Governance-Driven Democratization. Critical Policy Studies 3(1): 3–14.
Ito Aio, The Challenges of Intermediary Organization in the Japanese Civil Society http://www.pdx.edu/cps/sites/www.pdx.edu.cps/files/Ito,%20Aoi.pdf
