ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL OF NUDGE AS A TOOL FOR PUBLIC POLICY
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Published
Feb 16, 2023
https://doi.org/10.33701/jiwbp.v12i2.3150
Download
Statistic
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
o solve societal problems, governments should open any means alternative tools of public policy. One of the public policy tools is nudge. Nudge relies on behavioral science to improve people’s decisions through small changes in the environments within which people make choices. However, there is criticism about using nudges in public. This paper will try to picture the discussion and debates on the nudge. The literature study is conducted to describe and understand a condition and seek views on a focused topic. The paper shows how the nudge operates and which system works better. In addition, it shows the debates on nudges about transparency and legitimacy
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The right of publication of all material information contained in this journal site is held by the editorial board / editor with the knowledge of the author. Journal Manager will uphold the moral rights of the author.
- The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles contained in this journal site refers to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license, which means that This license lets others remix, adapt, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is often compared to “copyleft” free and open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.
- Each Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja journal, both printed and electronic, is open access for educational, research and library purposes. Beyond this purpose, publishers or journal managers are not responsible for copyright infringement committed by readers or users.
References
Bovens, L. (2009). “The Ethics of Nudge.” In Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology, eds.Till Grune-Yanoff and Sven Ove Hansson, 207–19. Berlin and New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Bradon, E. (2016). Realistic Reasons to be Bullish on Nudging. Available at: https://behavioralscientist.org/realistic-reasons-to-be-bullish-on-nudging/ [Accessed September 29, 2022].
Grune-Yanoff, Till. (2012). “Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 635–45.
Halpern D. (2015). Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. London, UK: WH Allen;
Hartley, J., (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services : Past and Present Innovation in Governance and Public Services : Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), pp.27–34.
Hausman, Daniel M. & Welch, Brynn (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):123-136.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Macmillan
K. Hammarberg, M. Kirkman, S. de Lacey. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them, Human Reproduction, Volume 31, Issue 3, March, Pages 498–501,
Kangsaputra, L. S. (2022). BRIN Ungkap Kemampuan Penelitian Indonesia Berada di Ranking Bawah. https://techno.okezone.com/read/2022/01/26/56/2538303/brin-ungkap-kemampuan-penelitian-indonesia-berada-di-ranking-bawah accessed May 9, 2022
Kosters, M., & Van der Heijden, J. (2015). From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory. Evaluation, 21(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015590218
OECD. (2011). Together for better Public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society. OECD Public Governance Reviews: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Behavioural insights and Public policy: Lessons from around the world. OECD.
Putra, I. P. (2022). Tertinggal, Riset dan Inovasi Indonesia di Peringkat 8 dari 11 Negara di Asia Tenggara. https://www.medcom.id/pendidikan/riset-penelitian/gNQexMVN-tertinggal-riset-dan-inovasi-indonesia-di-peringkat-8-dari-11-negara-di-asia-tenggara accessed May 9, 2022
Schmidt, A. (2017). The Power to Nudge. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 404-417. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000028
Sobaci, M.Z. & Karkin, N. (2013). The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better Public services? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp.417–425.
Thaler, Richard, Cass Sunstein. (2008). Nudge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Yiling Lin, Magda Osman, Richard Ashcroft. (2017). Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethic, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39:6.
Bradon, E. (2016). Realistic Reasons to be Bullish on Nudging. Available at: https://behavioralscientist.org/realistic-reasons-to-be-bullish-on-nudging/ [Accessed September 29, 2022].
Grune-Yanoff, Till. (2012). “Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 635–45.
Halpern D. (2015). Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. London, UK: WH Allen;
Hartley, J., (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services : Past and Present Innovation in Governance and Public Services : Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), pp.27–34.
Hausman, Daniel M. & Welch, Brynn (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):123-136.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Macmillan
K. Hammarberg, M. Kirkman, S. de Lacey. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them, Human Reproduction, Volume 31, Issue 3, March, Pages 498–501,
Kangsaputra, L. S. (2022). BRIN Ungkap Kemampuan Penelitian Indonesia Berada di Ranking Bawah. https://techno.okezone.com/read/2022/01/26/56/2538303/brin-ungkap-kemampuan-penelitian-indonesia-berada-di-ranking-bawah accessed May 9, 2022
Kosters, M., & Van der Heijden, J. (2015). From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory. Evaluation, 21(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015590218
OECD. (2011). Together for better Public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society. OECD Public Governance Reviews: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Behavioural insights and Public policy: Lessons from around the world. OECD.
Putra, I. P. (2022). Tertinggal, Riset dan Inovasi Indonesia di Peringkat 8 dari 11 Negara di Asia Tenggara. https://www.medcom.id/pendidikan/riset-penelitian/gNQexMVN-tertinggal-riset-dan-inovasi-indonesia-di-peringkat-8-dari-11-negara-di-asia-tenggara accessed May 9, 2022
Schmidt, A. (2017). The Power to Nudge. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 404-417. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000028
Sobaci, M.Z. & Karkin, N. (2013). The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better Public services? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp.417–425.
Thaler, Richard, Cass Sunstein. (2008). Nudge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Yiling Lin, Magda Osman, Richard Ashcroft. (2017). Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethic, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39:6.