Policy Adequacy in Delegating Several Authorities to Sub-District Head to Improve the Quality of Waste Management Services at Tangerang Regency Banten Province
Abstrak
This research aims to analyzing adequacy policy of delegating in part of authority deeply and also developing the relevant model. This research is using descriptive design with qualitative approach. Research informant are cleanliness and landscaping agency head, Sub-district head of Cikupa, Sub-district head of Kelapa Dua, Indonesia Clerical Council head and society. Data collecting technique are observation, interview, and documentation. Data is analyzed in descriptive method. Research result shows that adequacy policy of delegating in part of authority to sub-district head in improving the service quality of waste management in Tangerang regency as shows that decreasing of policy cost and increasing of policy effectiveness. Based on these research, developed adequacy model of delegation in part of authority in improving the service quality of waste management at Tangerang regency. These model is theoretical enrichment of Dunn’s adequacy policy theory especially in the third quadrant namely the changing of policy effectiveness and the changing of policy cost. It is different with Dunn’s adequacy policy model which is not focusing in the third quadrant as adequacy policy, this model shows that adequacy policy in the third quadrant namely the changing of policy cost and the changing of policy effectiveness.Unduhan
Referensi
Agustino Leo. 2008. Dasar-dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta. Amin Widjaja Tunggal, 2007. Audit Manajemen. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Sekertariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Barker, Robert L. 1978. The social Work Dictionary. National Association of Social. Workers. Maryland: Silver Spring.
Baker, D. C. & McLelland, J. N. 2003. “Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia's environmental assessment process for first nations' participation in mining development.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 581-603.
Bryan, Carolie dan Louis G. White. 1989. Manajemen Pembangunan Untuk Negara Berkembang. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Dye R. Thomas, (2007). “Under Standing Public Policy”, Pentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, USA.
Dunn, William, 2013 “Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik”, Gadjah mada University Press.Jogjakarta.
Hamdi, Muchlis. 2014. Kebijakan Publik proses, analisis dan partisipasi”, Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor.
Ismail dan Fahrurozi, 1997, “Perkembangan Organisasi Kecamatan Dari Masa ke Masa, Fokus Media : Bandung.
Jones, Charles O, 2004 “An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy”, (Third Edition), Wadsworth, Inc., Belmont, California.
Lubis, S.B, Hari, Martani Huseini, 1987, “Teori Organisasi, Suatu. Pendekatan Makro, Jakarta, PAU Ilmu Ilmu Sosial UI.
McGregor, D. 1966. The Human Side of Enterprise. The Management Review
Nigro, A. Felix and G. Liyd Nigro, 2004. Modern Public Administration, New York: Harper International Edition.
Osborne, Stephen P and Louis Brown. 2013. Understanding Innovation in Public Service. Dalam Handbook of Innovation in the Public Service. Cheltenham. UK
Potter, Christopher C and Jennifer Harries. 2011. Determinants of Policy Effectiveness. The World Health Organization.
Soekartawi. 2002. Analisis Usaha Tani. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Suharno. 2009. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
_______. 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Suryaningrat, Bayu (1990) “Pamong Praja dan Kepala Wilayah.,Bandung,Bumi Aksara
Syafrudin, Ateng (2007) “Ilmu Pemerintahan Dalam Konteks Kepamongprajaan” .Jatinangor.
Tangkilisan, Hesel Nogi. 2003. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta Thoha, Miftah. (1984). Dimensi-dimensi Prima Administrasi Negara. Jakarta : Rajawali.
Winarno, Budi. 2007, Kebijakan Publik, teori dan Proses, Jakarta: Media Pressindo.
