The Implementation of Performance Management System to Ensure Accountability in Public Sector: A Case Study in Sukabumi City

Keywords: Implementation; performance; Government of Sukabumi City


Every money spent and used by Government must be oriented to outcomes that can be measured by performance accountability, because all money that Government has is coming from taxes. Government Institution Performance Accountability System is a method that ensures every money spent by the Government must be oriented to outcomes, impacts and benefits that can be felt by the people. That is, the function of the Government Agency Performance Accountability System is to encourage performance of public sector. In the last three years the performance of Sukabumi City Government has not shown steady increase. This study aims to find out and explain how the implementation of a Government Agency Performance Accountability Management System in improving the performance of the Government of Sukabumi City. The method used by researchers in this study is a qualitative, descriptive method with an inductive approach. Then the data collection techniques used are interviews, documentation and observation, where researchers focus on the variables to be studied in order to obtain an empirical picture in the field..  Furthermore, to dissect the management of Government Institution Performance Accountability System in improving the performance of the City Government of Sukabumi, the researcher applied the Edward III Implementation theory, where the Implementation theory has four indicators namely communication, resources, disposition/attitude and bureaucratic structure. The results obtained by researchers based on empirical facts in the field through primary and secondary data, found that the government of Sukabumi City still faces some issues on human resources and organizational structure.


Download data is not yet available.


Battacherjee, Arnol, 2012, Social Science Research , Creative Commons Attribution-BY, United States of America.

Berg, Bruce L, 2001, Qualitative Research Method for The Social Science , California State Universty. United States of America.

Best, Jhon W, 2006, Educational Research Method , Allyn and Bucon, United States of America.

Crano, W. 2002, Principles and Methods Of Social Research , Lawrence Eribaum Associates, London

Denzin and Linclon, 2006, Qualitative Research , Student Library, Jakarta

Flippo, Edwin B, 1984, Personnel Management Sixth Edition , Illionois, New York.

Goode and Hatt, 1952, Methods and Social Research , Hill Book Company, Toronto.

Creswell, John, 2004, Research Design , Student Library, Jakarta.

Khotari, CR 2004. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques , New Age International, New Delhi.

Leddy, Paul, 1997, Practical Research Planning and Design , Pretice Hall, New Jersy.

Moleong, Lexy J, 2010, Revised Edition Qualitative Approach Methodology , Youth Kosida Karya, Bandung.

Neuman, W Laurence, 2006, Social Research Methods , Allyn and Bucon, United States of America.

Punch, Keith F, 2006 , Developing Effective Research Proposal , The Crom Well Press, Great Britain.

Silalahi, Uber, 2012, Social research methods , Rafika Aditama, Jakarta.

Travers, MW Robert, An Introduction to Educational Research, The Macmillan Company, United States of America.

Wallman, Nicholas, 2011, Research Method The Basic , Routledge, United States

Wendell French, 1974, The Personal Management Process , Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

Winarno, Budi , 2012 , Public Policy (Theory, Process, and Case Studies) . Jakarta: CAPS

Wahab, Solichin Abdul , 2008 , Analysis of Policy From Formulation to Implementation of State Policy. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Law - Law Number 25 of 2009 on Public Services

Law - No. 2 3 2014 on Pe merintah Regions

Government Regulation Number 29 of 2000 concerning the Performance Accountability System of Government Agencies

Government Regulation Number 12 of 2019 concerning Regional Financial Management

Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform Number 53 of 2014 concerning Technical Guidelines for Performance Agreements, Performance Reporting and Procedures for Reviewing Performance Reports of Government Agencies.