Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah Kabupaten Ponorogo Tentang Program Kegiatan Rukun Tetangga

Danang Prastiyo; Bambang Widiyahseno; Irvan Nur Ridho; Yusuf Adam Hilman

doi:10.61076/jpp.v5i2.3880

Danang Prastiyo Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, FISIP, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
Bambang Widiyahseno Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, FISIP, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
Irvan Nur Ridho Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, FISIP, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
Yusuf Adam Hilman Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, FISIP, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61076/jpp.v5i2.3880

Keywords: Neighborhood Activities, Policy Implementation;

Abstract

Ponorogo Regency launched an assistance program for community strengthening in the smallest scope, namely the Rukun Tetangga (RT). ratified through Circular Letter (SE) of the Regent. The Ponorogo Regency Government provides funds of IDR 10,000,000 annually to each Neighborhood Association in the entire Ponorogo Regency Region which consists of 6,869 the Rukun Tetangga (RT). The programs include: making infiltration wells or what is called Biopori Infiltration, Waste Management in the RT scope, provision of RT Wireless Fidelity (Wifi) networks, Strengthening Women's Economy, Employment BPJS benefits and incentives for RT administrators, Family Medicine Planting and Resident; Rembug Warga. This study aims to find out how the program is implemented and what are the obstacles. This type of research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The results of this study show that this RT activity program is an initiation from the Regent of Ponorogo which has been stated in the vision and mission. All RT activity programs have been implemented, but there are several programs that are not appropriate because they are not in accordance with regional conditions, such as: Biopore Infiltration, Integrated Waste, and planting family medicine. programs that are not suitable because they do not involve the RT community who know their needs better.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anis, A., & Ana Anggorowati Dwi. (2019). Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu Desa Karangkates Untuk Mencapai Zero Waste. Industri Inovatif : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.36040/industri.v9i1.376

Azahra, A., & Lubis, F. A. (2021). Peran DPRD dalam Pengawasan dan Kendala-Kendala terhadap Pelaksanaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) di Provinsi Sumatera Utara Kota Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai,5,https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/2324

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Ponorogo. (2022). Ponorogo dalam angka 2022 (p. 275).

Budi, B. S., & Mawardi. (2016). Pemanfaatan LRB dalam Mengatasi Genangan Air, Banjir dan Kekeringan di Kecamatan Banyumanik. Jurnal Polines, 4(2), 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.32497/bangunrekaprima.v1i2, Oktober.701

Dr. Rukin, S. P. M. S. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar CendekiaIndonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=GyWyDwAAQBAJ

Endraswara, S. (2006). Metode, Teori, Teknik Penelitian Kebudayaan. Pustaka Widyatama. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=d27VDw5TbF0C

Huberman, M. B. M. & A. M. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. Sage Publications.

Husni Zelika, H. A. (2022). Implementasi Program Penerima Bantuan Iuran (PBI) Jaminan Kesehatan Di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS), 1(4), 139–146.

Kominfo Ponorogo. (n.d.). Visi Misi Pemerintah Kabupaten Ponorogo 2021. Ponorogo.Go.Id.

Nanda, H. I., & , Diana Eka Mei, Ella Rusmayanti, N. L. (2018). Peningkatan Akurasi Data Kependudukan Tingkat RT dan RW. SENADIMAS, 461–466.

Norman K. Denzin. (1978). THE RESEARCH ACT A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. In Syria Studies (Vol. 7, Issue 1). McGRAW-HILL BOOKCOMPANY.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625

Nugrahani, F., & Hum, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif. In Cakra Books (Vol.1,Issue1).http://ejournal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT%0Ahttp://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/viewFile/11345/10753%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.758%0Awww.iosrjournals.org

Ponorogo. (n.d.). RPJM KABUPATEN PONOROGO Tahun 2016-2021.

Ponorogo, P. K. (2022). SE Bupati Terbit , Program Dana RT Langsung Jalan. 198, 2021–2022.

Rosdiyani, T. & N. S. (2020). Pemasangan Jaringan Internet Berbasis Wireless Fidelity (Wifi) Di Kampung Wangun Cipurut. ABDIKARYA: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 2(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.47080/abdikarya.v2i2.1074

S, S. . S., & Alam, R. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Makassar mengenai Pemberian Insentif kepada Ketua RT dan RW. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v4i1.797

Saptatiningsih, R. I., Nugrahani, T. S., & Rejeki, S. (2015). Pemberdayaan Perempuan Desa untuk Mengurangi Kemiskinan. Seminar Nasional Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, 512–524.

Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Literasi Media Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=QPhFDwAAQBAJ

Suhariyanti, E., Amalia, R., & Aliva, M. (2021). Peningkatan Kesehatan Masyarakat Melalui Sosialisasi Penggunaan Tanaman Obat Keluarga ( Toga ) Di Lingkungan Bandung Improving Community Health Through Socialization Of The Use Of Medicinal Plants In The Family ( Toga ) In Lingkungan Bandung. AS-SYIFA: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Kesehatan Masyarakat, 1, 31–36.

William N. Dunn. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, New Jersey: Pearson Education. Dalam Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik (kedua). Gajah Mada University Press.