Implementing Smart Governance in Realizing a Smart City: Case Study Catur Tourism Village, Bangli, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v17i1.5488Keywords:
Smart Governance Implementation, Smart City, Catur Tourism Village, Traditional VillageAbstract
The implementation of Smart Governance in villages across Bangli Regency serves as a foundation for the realization of Bangli Smart City. One of the pilot villages for this initiative is Desa Wisata Catur (Catur Tourism Village). However, its implementation still faces several challenges, such as suboptimal intersectoral collaboration and limited human resources in the village. This study aims to examine how smart governance is implemented in Catur Tourism Village, Kintamani District, Bangli Regency. The research adopts a qualitative descriptive method with an inductive approach, as outlined by Sugiyono. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and analyzed using data reduction, information presentation, and conclusion drawing techniques. The findings indicate that in the public and social services dimension, public services in Catur Village have been successfully developed through multi-stakeholder collaboration, particularly by promoting Subak Abian as a tourism asset based on traditional values and social inclusiveness. in the participation in decision-making dimension, community participation is institutionalized through customary forums and formal institutions, resulting in inclusive, transparent, and accountable village policies. In the provision of facilities and infrastructure dimension, the development of tourism and agricultural infrastructure has supported community productivity while preserving local cultural values. Lastly, in the online services dimension, digital services remain limited to a basic informational website due to constraints in human resources and funding. This study concludes that the implementation of smart governance in Catur Tourism Village has been progressing well, with local cultural values playing a central role in its realization. Nevertheless, the village still faces limitations in optimizing online services to fully leverage digitalization in rural governance.
Downloads
References
1. Agus Bahrudin, & Wahyuningsih, C. D. (2023). Implementasi sistem pemerintah berbasis elektronik dalam mewujudkan smart city di Dinas Kominfos Denpasar Bali. Mimbar Administrasi FISIP UNTAG Semarang, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v20i1.676
2. Ardiyasa, G. G., & Rahayu, E. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan Smart Kampung di Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v8i4.2863
3. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
4. Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, 8(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X
5. Edward III, C. G. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
6. Faisal, F. (2013). Pemberdayaan Industri Kecil dan Menengah di Daerah. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 12(3), 35–45.
7. Giffinger, R., Fetner, C., Kramar, H., & Kalasek, R. (2007). Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology.
8. Grindle, M. S. (Ed.). (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1m323qj
9. Hendrawan, S. A., Chatra, A., Iman, N., Hidayatullah, S., & Suprayitno, D. (2024). Digital transformation in MSMEs: Challenges and opportunities in technology management. Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi, 6(2), 141–149. https://jidt.org/jidt/article/view/551/354
10. Ivanova, T. (2024). Assessing the influence of local government capacity on public service delivery: Insights from Indonesia’s decentralization experience. Integra Business Review, 2(1). https://www.iacs.co.id/ibr/article/view/50
11. Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2022). Smart urban governance: An alternative to technocratic “smartness”. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10481-9
12. Kaiser, Z. A. (2024). Smart governance for smart cities and nations. Journal of Economy and Technology, 2, 216–234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949948824000313
13. Labolo, M. (2014). Memahami ilmu pemerintahan: Suatu kajian, teori, konsep, dan pengembangannya (Ed. revisi, cet. ke-7). Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
14. Mahardika, I. G. (2023). Pengembangan smart village di Desa Belalang: Implementasi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pemerintahan desa. Jurnal Teknologi dan Inovasi Desa, 5(2), 45–56.
15. Mathew, B. P., & Bangwal, D. (2024). People centric governance model for smart cities development: A systematic review, thematic analysis, and findings. Research in Globalization, 9, 100237. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000467
16. Mukhlis, M. M. (2025). Regional Government Autonomy in Indonesia: The Ambiguity of the Federalism of Republic Model. Malaysian J. Syariah & L., 13, 35. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/mlsnjl13&div=5&id=&page=
17. Nuryanti, W. (1993). Concept, perspective and challenges of rural tourism in Indonesia. Tourism in Indonesia, 1(1), 1–8.
18. Popova, Y., & Popovs, S. (2023). Effects and externalities of smart governance. Smart Cities, 6, 1109–1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020053
19. Pratama, A. (2014). Smart city: Konsep dan implementasinya di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
20. Ruijer, E., Van Twist, A., Haaker, T., Tartarin, T., Schuurman, N., Melenhorst, M., & Meijer, A. (2023). Smart Governance Toolbox: A Systematic Literature Review. Smart Cities, 6(2), 878–896. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020042
21. Sapraji, S. (2023). Implementasi smart city di Kota Tangerang Selatan Banten. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia (JISI), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/jisi.v4i2.37124
22. Su, K., Li, J., & Fu, H. (2011). Smart city and the applications. In 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC) (pp. 1028–1031). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECC.2011.6066743
23. Sugiyono, D. R. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.
24. Sunaryo, B. (2013). Kebijakan pembangunan destinasi pariwisata: Konsep dan aplikasinya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
25. Susanto, P. (2022). Pengelolaan pariwisata berbasis digital di Bali: Peran e-government dalam sektor pariwisata. Jurnal Pariwisata Digital, 8(3), 88–102.
26. Sutawa, G. K. (2012). Issues on Bali tourism development and community empowerment to support sustainable tourism development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00356-5
27. Tresiana, N., Duadil, N., & Damayantie, A. (2023). Deliberative democracy innovations at citizen level: Challenges of local government in Indonesia. Lex Localis, 21(4), 807–832. https://www.proquest.com/openview/16f08131a53770c7427870c5b543dfdc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=55210
28. Wahyudi, D. (2022). Implementasi Smart Village di Desa Kutuh: Kolaborasi Pemerintah Desa dan Lembaga Adat dalam Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Desa. Jurnal Pembangunan Desa, 7(1), 112–125.
29. Xue, B., Han, B., Li, H., Gou, X., Yang, H., Thomas, H., & Stückrad, S. (2023). Understanding ecological civilization in China: From political context to science. Ambio, 52(12), 1895–1909. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-023-01897-2
30. Yoeti, O. A. (1996). Pengantar ilmu pariwisata. Bandung: Angkasa.
31. Yuliana, T. (2023). Perspektif Governance dalam Pengembangan Desa Tegal Harum sebagai Smart Village. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Pembangunan, 10(2), 50–62.
