PROCESS DIMENSION ANALYSIS ON THE SUCCESS OF CHILD MARRIAGE PREVENTION POLICY

AHMAD YUSRONI; Khairur Raziqin; Muhammad Dzul Fadli

doi:10.33701/jiwbp.v15i2.5585

Authors

AHMAD YUSRONI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA
Khairur Raziqin Universitas Bima Internasional MFH
Muhammad Dzul Fadli Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33701/jiwbp.v15i2.5585

Keywords:

Policy Success, Process Dimension, Policy Success Degree, Child Marriage Prevention

Abstract

Children are the foundation of a nation's human resources, an important issue affecting child welfare is child marriage. The East Java Provincial Government issued a policy in the form of a Governor's Circular Letter (SE) on the prevention of child marriage, Malang Regency as an area with a high marriage rate in East Java followed up on the SE. After three years, the efforts made have succeeded in reducing the number of child marriages in Malang District each year. This article analyzes the follow-up process of the child marriage prevention policy in Malang District using a descriptive qualitative research method, case study research type with Allan McConnell's Policy Success theory as the analytical knife. This article explores the success of the child marriage prevention policy from the process dimension, as well as the level of success using the degree of policy success/failure. The results showed the success of the policy in the process dimension, firstly maintaining policy objectives / instruments, all SE Child Marriage Prevention objectives were maintained with several derivative policies, although there was one policy instrument related to the budget that was not fully maintained. The level of success is included in Resilient Success. Second, ensuring policy legitimacy, where the entire SE follow-up process is legitimized by all parties, so the success level is included in Success. Third, building a sustainable coalition, the Malang District Government built a sustainable coalition to overcome the problem of child marriage through the policies made. The success rate is also included in Success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews, M., & School, H. K. (2022). What is public policy success, especially in development? www.hks.harvard.edu

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

BAPPENAS. (2023). Sistem Perlindungan Anak.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2021). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Begley, P., Bochel, C., Bochel, H., Defty, A., Gordon, J., Hinkkainen, K., Kisby, B., McKay, S., & Strange, G. (2019). Assessing policy success and failure: targets, aims and processes. Policy Studies, 40(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1557134

Checkland, K., Hammond, J., Coleman, A., Macinnes, J., Mikelyte, R., Croke, S., Billings, J., Bailey, S., & Allen, P. (2023). “Success” in policy piloting: Process, programs, and politics. Public Administration, 101(2), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12790

Crick, B. (2013). In Defence of Politics (London: Bloomsbury).

Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. (2022). Rekap Data Jenis Perkara Dispensasi Kawin Tahun 2022 Wilayah Hukum PTA SURABAYA. Https://Kinsatker.Badilag.Net/JenisPerkara/Perkara_persatker_detail/362/51/2022.

Fellows, C. J., & Dollery, B. (2021). Australian Government failure and the VET FEE-HELP loan programme. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(1), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2020-0256

Issalys, P. (2021). Choosing among Forms of Public Action: A Question of Legitimacy in Eliadis, P., Hill, M. M. and Howlett, M. (eds) Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press), pp. 154–81.

Kemenag Kabupaten Malang. (2024). Perjanjian Kerja Sama antara Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Malang dengan Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak Kabupaten Malang tentang Pelaksanaan Program Satuan Pendidikan Ramah Anak, Tempat ibadah Ramah Anak dan Upaya Penekanan Perkawinan Anak serta Fasilitasi pendampingan perlindungan anak.

Kemenag Kabupaten Malang. (2024). Jumlah Kasus Perkawinan anak di Kabupaten Malang pada 2019-2022.

Kemenag RI. (2022). Laporan Usia Pengantin.

Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2022). Policy Learning, Policy Failure, and the Mitigation of Policy Risks: Re-Thinking the Lessons of Policy Success and Failure. Administration and Society, 54(7), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211065344

Luetjens, J. (2019). Successful Public Policy: Lessons From Australia and New Zealand The Rise and Fall of Public Institutions View project Security in Open Societies View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335882991

Mardiyanta, A., & Ermawan, D. (2023). Gray area between policy success and failure: Assessing the degree of success of Law Number 7 of 2016 in the salt industrialization program in West Nusa Tenggara Province. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 36(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v36i12023.156-171

Mcconnell, A. (2010). Understanding Policy Success Rethinking Public Policy.

McConnell, A. (2017). Policy Success and Failure. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.137

McConnell, A. (2021). Great Policy Successes: Or, a Tale About Why It’s Amazing That Governments Get So Little Credit for Their Many Everyday and Extraordinary Achievements as Told by Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Create Space for a Less Relentlessly Negative View of Our Pivotal Public Institutions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(3), 389–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1752607

Pemerintah Kabupaten Malang. (2023a). Perjanjian Kerja Sama antara Pemerintah Kabupaten Malang dan Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang dan Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Malang tentang Upaya Penanggulangan Perkawinan di Bawah Umur di Kabupaten Malang.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Malang. (2023b). Perjanjian Kerja Sama antara Pemerintah Kabupaten Malang dan Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang tentang Perlindungan Perempuan Dan Anak Untuk Pengurangan Angka Dispensasi Kawin Dan Perceraian Serta Layanan Disabilitas.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor 16 tahun 2019 Tentang Perkawinan.

Subekti, T., & Ulfah, I. F. (2023). Collaborative Governance in Preventing Marriage Problems Among Children in Malang Regency (pp. 352–358). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-194-4_36

Thalib, J. U. (2024). Application Of Marriage Age According To Law Number 16 Of 2019 Concerning Amendments To Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage (Study At The Malang Regency Religious Court). International Significance of Notary, 5, 2655–7789. https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/SIGN/article/view/24394

UNICEF. (2020). Situasi Anak Di 2020 Indonesia.

UNICEF. (2022). For every child, every opportunity. www.unicef.org

Wang, J. song, & Wei, F. (2009). Distortions in Implementing Public Policy. Transnational Corporations Review, 1(4), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2009.11658214

Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2017). Theories of the policy process.