Karet Alam Sebagai Basis Pembangunan Pedesaan dan Peningkatan Tarap Hidup Masyarakat yang Berkelanjutan: Kritik Atas Paradigma Developmentalisme
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The research argues that natural rubber plantation can become a main priority of development process in Indonesian rural regions. Even thought by four years the price of the commodity has been impressively decreasing, it does not relate with the quality and prosperity of farmer’s daily life. Moreover, the plantation has a sustainable characteristic as the commodity is adaptive with environmental biodiversity. This argument can be a point of view to criticize the paradigm of developmentalism focusing on the economic growth and industrialization. Besides, by using the paradigm of institutionalism, as the highest population of poor families concentrated in the rural region, it also argues that the main duty of current Indonesia government is how to stabilize the rubber price in the national market and how to develop a sustainable institution of rubber farmers. Qualitative method was adopted in the research when the primary and secondary data are collected through observation, documentation, and in-deep interview. The research was conducted in Bengkalis regency, Riau Province, and Garut regency, West Java.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
- The right of publication of all material information contained in this journal site is held by the editorial board / editor with the knowledge of the author. Journal Manager will uphold the moral rights of the author.
- The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles contained in this journal site refers to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license, which means that This license lets others remix, adapt, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is often compared to “copyleft” free and open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.
- Each Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja journal, both printed and electronic, is open access for educational, research and library purposes. Beyond this purpose, publishers or journal managers are not responsible for copyright infringement committed by readers or users.
References
Anonim. (2017) Natural rubber prices expected to decline. Weibold. the UK
Anwar. C. 2006. Perkembangan Pasar Dan Prospek Agrabisnis Karet alam Di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian Karet alam. Tjokrowinoto, M. Tt. Konsep dan Isue Pembangunan Nasional. MAP UGM.
Asmani N. (2012) PENYERAPAN EMISI DAN PENINGKATAN PENDAPATAN MASYARAKAT SEKITAR KAWASAN HUTAN PRODUKSI YANG TERDEGRADASI MELAUI KEGIATAN AGROFORESTRY KARET ALAM. SEMINAR NASIONAL KARET ALAM PERHEPPI JAMBI.
BPS. (2018) Jumlah Penduduk Miskin, Persentase Penduduk Miskin dan Garis Kemiskinan, 1970-2017. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Borg, R., Toikka, A., & Primmer, E. (2015). Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 90-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.008
Creswell JW and Creswell JD. (2017) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications.
Cortner, H. J. (2014). Governance and Institutions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 65-96.
Fakih M. ( 2001) Runtuhnya Teori Pembangunan dan Globalisasi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hamilton-Hart, N. (2014). Multi Level (mis)governance of Palm Oil Production. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 1-21. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2014.978738
Hendaryati ED. (2017) Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2015-2017 Karet alam. Sekretariat Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Kementerian Pertanian.
Hooijer A, Page S, Canadell J, et al. (2010) Current and future CO 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences 7: 1505-1514.
Investment I. (2018) Karet alam.
Jhingan ML. (1988) Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Perencanaan, Jakarta: Rajwali.
Kniivilä M. (2007) Industrial development and economic growth: Implications for poverty reduction and income inequality. Industrial development for the 21st century: Sustainable development perspectives 1: 295-333.
Kuznets S. (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review: 1-28.
Meilani E. (2017) Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berperan Dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani Karet Alam Di Desa Bhakti Negara Kecamatan Pakuan Ratu Kabupaten Way Kanan. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Miettinen J, Hooijer A, Shi C, et al. (2012) Extent of industrial plantations on Southeast Asian peatlands in 2010 with analysis of historical expansion and future projections. Gcb Bioenergy 4: 908-918.
Miharja R. (2014) Pengaruh Tingkat Pendapatan Petani Karet alam Terhadap Kesejahteraan Keluarga di Desa Gunung Kesiangan Kecamatan Benai Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Sarif Kasim Riau.
Mustofa C. (2007) Diktat Mata Kuliah Studi Pembangunan. Surabaya Indonesia: IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. .
Ostrom E and Hess C. (2000) Private and common property rights. BOUCKAERT, Boudewijn a Gerrit DE GEEST (eds.). Encyclopedia of law and economics 2: 53-106.
Parhusip AB. (2008) Potret karet alam Indonesia. Economic Review 213.
PPKIBP. 2015. Analisis Pemanfaatan Negosiasi Komoditas Untuk Meningkatkan Harga Jual Produk Karet Indonesia ke Dunia. Jakarta: Kementrian Perdagangan.
Purnomo D. (2009) Fenomena migrasi tenaga kerja dan perannya bagi pembangunan daerah asal: studi empiris di kabupaten wonogiri.
Purnomo, E. P. A., PB; Choi, Jin-Wook. (2017). The complexity and consequences of the policy implementation dealing with sustainable ideas. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 1-16.
Quinn CH, Huby M, Kiwasila H, et al. (2007) Design principles and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania. Journal of environmental management 84: 100-113.
Ramdani R. (2017) The Debate of Development Idea: What Do We Mean by Development and How Do We Measure It?
Ramdani, R. (2016). PENDELEGASIAN KEWENANGAN DALAM PENGELOLAAN HUTAN: Studi Kasus Kelompok Tani Hutan (KTH) Kemasyarakatan Sedyo Makmur Kecamatan Semanu, Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. PUBLISIA (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 1(2).
Rostow WW. (1990) The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto: Cambridge university press.
Sachs JD. (2015) The age of sustainable development: Columbia University Press.
Safi’I, H.M. 2009. Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah. Yogyakarta. Averros.
Savić D, Jeremic V and Petrovic N. (2016) Rebuilding the pillars of sustainable society index: A multivariate post hoc I-distance approach.
Sekretaris Jendral. 2007. Sekilas Indutri Karet alam. Jakarta: Kementrian Perindutrian dan Perdagangan.
Sen A. (2000) Development as freedom. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE-OXFORD- 10: 258-258.
Solow RM. (1988) Growth theory and after. The American Economic Review 78: 307-317.
Sukirno S. (2006) Makroekonomi; Teori Pengantar, Jakarta: Grasindo.
Susetiawan. (2009) Pembangunan dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat: Ketidakberdayaan Para Pihak Melawan Konstruksi Neoliberalisme. Yogyakarta Pusat Studi Pedesaan dan Kawasan UGM, 30-35
Susetiawan. (2012) Teori People Center Development. Dalam Mater Kuliah MAP UGM. Yogyakarta: MAG UGM.
Ul Haq M. (2003) The human development paradigm. S. Fukuda-Parr and AK.
Willis K. (2011) Theories and practices of development: Taylor & Francis.
Wulandari A. (2006) Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Dari Indonesia Ke Amerika Kurun Waktu 1980-2003. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
ZURRIYATI Y, BATUBARA A and SYAM A. (2004) Kajian integrasi ternak kambing dengan perkebunan karet alam di Propinsi Riau. Sistem Integrasi Tanaman-Ternak. Denpsar: 20-22.