A Model for Simplifying the Organizational Structure of the Bureaucracy in Indonesia

  • Halilul Khairi Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Sumedang-Indonesia
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v14i1.2349
Keywords: organizational model, simplification of structure, government affairs

Abstract

This research aimed to determine a simplified organizational structure based on the characteristics of the duties and functions of government affairs. A qualitative approach was employed in 5 provinces through a criteria-based selection technique. The data were collected through documentation research, questionnaires, as well as interviews, and analyzed based on government affairs and regional characteristics. The results showed that the implementation of government affairs is included in several groups. The first, Group I (2 sections and 3 subsections), comprises public order, peace, community protection, and transportation (archipelago). Group II (2 sections and 1 subsection) consists of health and labor, while Group III (2 subsections without sections) entails community and village empowerment, marine and fisheries, and trade, alongside energy and mineral resources. Finally, Group IV (1 subsection without section) includes the environment and land.

Keywords: Organizational Model; Simplification Of Structure; Government Affairs

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan menemukan model penyederhanaan struktur organisasi berdasarkan karakteristik tugas dan fungsi urusan pemerintahan. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Lokasi penelitian dilaksanakan di 5 daerah provinsi dengan teknik pemilihan berbasis kriteria. Pengumpulan data dilaksanakan melalui studi dokumentasi, pengisian daftar isian, dan wawancara. Data yang terkumpul selanjutnya dianalisis melalui analisis data model organisasi berdasarkan urusan pemerintahan dan karakteristik daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pelaksanaan urusan pemerintahan yang termasuk kelompok I (2 seksi dan 3 subbagian), yaitu ketentraman ketertiban umum dan perlindungan masyarakat, dan perhubungan (kepulauan). Kelompok II (2 seksi dan 1 subbagian) yaitu kesehatan dan tanaga kerja. Kelompok III (2 subbagian tanpa seksi) yaitu pemberdayaan masyarakat dan desa, kelautan dan perikanan, perdagangan, dan energi dan sumber daya mineral. Kelompok IV (1 subbagian tanpa seksi) yaitu lingkungan hidup, dan pertanahan.

Kata Kunci: Model Organisasi; Penyederhanaan Struktur; Urusan Pemerintahan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adlin, T. H. (2018). Penguatan Perilaku Anti Korupsi di Lingkungan Birokrasi Pemerintah Provinsi Riau. Nakhoda Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 17(29). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v17i29.7058

Aghina, W. et all. (2017). The 5 Trademarks of Agile Ornaizations. McKinsey & Company.

Ahmad, J. (2012). Perjalanan Old Public Administration (OPA), New Public Management (NPM), New Public Service (NPS) Menuju Manajemen Publik Kelas Dunia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pemerintahan, 1(1). http://jurnal.umsrappang.ac.id/praja/article/view/155

Anzola-Roman, P. et all. (2018). Organizational innovation, internal R&D and externally sourced innovation practices: Effects on technological innovation outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 91, 233–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.014

Arey, H. et all. (2020). The Readiness of Disadvantaged Regions in Implementing E-Government in Indonesia : Case Study in East Seram Regency. Manajemen Pemerintahan, 12(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i2.1285

Arikunto, S. (2007). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka CIpta.

Batu, K. L & Yuardani, A. M. (2020). Investigating the Antecedents of Green Society Satisfaction ( GSS ): Collaborative Good Government Practices ( CGGP ) as Mediating Variable An Empirical Study in Pontianak City. Manajemen Pemerintahan, 12(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i1.839

Bryant, C. & White, L. G. (1987). Manajemen Pembangunan Untuk Negara-Negara Berkembang. LP3ES.

Centre for Public Service Innovation. (2004). From Red Tape to Smart Tape. In Future Watch.

Daft, R. L. (2002). Organization Theory and Design. West Publishing Co.

Dasilva, N. A. M. M. (2020). Policy Implementation of One Door Integrated Service in Kendari City. Manajemen Pemerintahan, 12(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i1.818

Faedlulloh, D. et all. (2020). A Structural and Mindset Bureaucratic Reform Agenda for Jokowi ’ s Second Term. Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v27i2.11466

Fridayani, J. A., & Dharma, U. S. (1875). Kepemimpinan Adaptif Dalam Agilitas Organisasi di Era Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru. MODUS, 33(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24002/modus.v33i2.4654

Goldsmith, S. and W. D. E. (2004). Governing by Networking: The New Shape of the Public Sector Innovation in American Government. Brookings Institution Press.

Goldsmith, S. E. W. D. (2004). Governing by Network. The Brookings Institution.

Gumilar, G. G., Delistiana, D. D., Purnamasari, H., Timur, T., Regency, K., & Java, W. (2021). The Elements of e-Government Success in Public Services at Bekasi Regency Using the “ SP4N LAPOR .” Manajemen Pemerintahan, 13(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v13i2.1503

Gurianova, E. S. M. (2015). Design of Organizational Structures of Management According to Strategy of Development of the Enterprises. Procedia Economic and Finance, 24, 395–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00695-4

Halili, R., & Kukovič, S. (2022). Organizational and Structural Approaches on Administrative Simplification: The Case of Kosovo. Administrative Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010018

Hasanah, S. dkk. (2016). Implementasi Pelimpahan Sebagian Urusan Walikota Kepada Camat Dalam Menunjang Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Camat Sambutan Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Administrative Reform, 4 (2), 80–91. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.52239/jar.v4i2.595

Heyman, B., Swain, J., & Gillman, M. (2004). Organisational simplification and secondary complexity in health services for adults with learning disabilities. Social Science and Medicine, 58(2), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00210-7

Hogan SJ;Leonard V. Coote. (2014). Organizational Culture, Innovation, and Performance: A test of Model, Schein’s. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007

Karno et all. (2020). The Impact of the Government Revolution 4.0 on District Integrated Administration Service (DIAS). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 19(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.19.2.2020.160

Kates, A. & Galbraith, J. A. (2007). Designing Your Organization: Using the Star Model to Solve 5 Critical Design Challenge. Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Khairi, H. (2021). Organisasi Sektor Publik. Penerbit NEM.

Kumar, R. (2008). Research Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd.

LeCompte, M. D., Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research (2nd ed.). Academic Press Inc.

Marini, T. H. (2019). Kajian Hambatan Jalur Regulasi Perizinan dan Birokrasi di Indonesia. October.

Marthalina. (2018). Peran pemerintah daerah dalam mengentaskan kemiskinan di kabupaten tangerang provinsi banten. Manajemen Pemerintahan, 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jt.v10i1.403

Martini, A., Tahir, M. I., & Khairi, H. (2019). Organizational Model Application on Local Acency Organizational Struture. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 21(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i2.21780

OECD. (2008). Administrative Simplification in France (pp. 111–130). (2004). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264100688-4-en

OECD.(2008). E-Government for Simplification. In Making Life Easy for Citizens and Businesses in Portugal (pp. 97–107). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264048263-7-en

Robbins, S. P. (1994). Teori Organisasi: Struktur, Desain dan Aplikasi. Arcan.

Romli, L. (2008). Masalah Reformasi Birokrasi. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen PNS, 2(2), 1–8. https://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/asn/article/view/149

Rukayat, Y. (2017). Kualitas pelayanan publik bidang administrasi kependudukan di kecamatan pasirjambu. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Ilmu Administrasi, 11(2), 56–65. https://jurnal.unnur.ac.id/index.php/jimia/article/view/32

Sagita, N. I. (2018). Dilema Pelimpahan Wewenang Walikota dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Terpadu. 1(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31334/trans.v1i2.307

Suwandi, I. M., & Yahya, A. S. (2017). Refleksi Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia (A. S. Yahya (Ed.); 1st ed.). Alqaprint.

Tahir, M. I. (2016). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2016 tentang Perangkat Daerah. Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, VI, 153–168.

Utami, Y. et all. (2020). Village Development Planning in The Digital Era : The Role and Interest of Stakeholders in Kotaagung , Tanggamus Regency Author : Manajemen Pemerintahan, 12(1), 198–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i2.1321

Yasa, A., Rafi, M., Rahmanto, F., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Penguatan Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Era Society 5 . 0 di Indonesia Strengthening Bureaucratic Reform Towards Society 5 . 0 Era in Indonesia. 20(01), 27–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i1.139

Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
Khairi, H. (2022). A Model for Simplifying the Organizational Structure of the Bureaucracy in Indonesia. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 14(1), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v14i1.2349