##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Muhadam Labolo

Abstract

The changes about Village policy provide both opportunities and threats to the development of village autonomy. Opportunities for the development of village autonomy are at least normatively gaining a foothold from two important principles of recognition and subsidiarity. The first principle as a form of recognition of village existence in various forms has actually been introduced through Law Number 22 Year 1999 and 32 Year 2004 which corrects efforts to uniform the lowest government entity of the village under another name. The second principle is the juridical consequence of the 1945 Constitution article 18B paragraph (2) where the state not only recognizes, also respects special and special units as long as it is still there and well maintained. This principle allows the state to allocate resources to the village even though the village is no longer subordinate to the state (mini bureaucracy) as the practice of Law 5/1979 through local state government paradigm. With the resources referred to the village at least have the opportunity to develop the original autonomy (self governing community) and not solely under the control of local governance system (local self-government). The allocation of resources from the government, provincial and district / city and the opening of access in the effort of developing village autonomy is not impossible to increase the tension in the village through abuse of authority and the potential of horizontal conflict. Village autonomy can ultimately contain threats if a number of important requirements can not be fulfilled given the culture, structure and environment that affect the village is much more dominant than the supradesa itself is quite distant with the community.

Keywords: village autonomy, opportunities, threats

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

Beratha, I Nyoman, 1982. Desa, Masyarakat Desa dan Pembangunan Desa, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Bintarto R, 1983. Interaksi Desa-Kota dan Permasalahannya, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Iver, Mc, 1999. Jaring-Jaring Pemerintahan (The Web of Goverment), Laila Hasyim, Aksara Baru, Jakarta
Jaweng, Robert Endi, 2012. RUU Tentang Desa: Kritik atas Proposal Minimalisasi Versi Pemerintah, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta
Kahin, George M, 2013. Nasionalisme dan Revolusi Indonesia, Komunitas Bambu, Edisi1, Jakarta
Koentjaraninggrat, 1964. Masyarakat Desa di Indonesia Masa Kini, Yayasan Badan Penerbit FE UI, Jakarta
Labolo, Muhadam, 2013. Memahami Ilmu Pemerintahan, Rajawali Press, Edisi 6, Jakarta
Ndraha, Taliziduhu, 2010. Ilmu Pemerintahan (Kybernology), PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
Nurcholis, Hanif, 2013. Dua Ratus Tahun Praktek Demokrasi Desa, Potret Kegagalan Adopsi Demokrasi Barat,Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta
Mutty, M Luthfi, 2012. Otonomi Desa: Harapan dan Kenyataan, Kasus Luwu Utara, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta
Tonies, Ferdinand, 1887. The Nature and Type of Sociological Theory, terj. IIP, Jakarta
Tahir, Irwan, 2013. Sejarah Perkembangan Desa di Indonesia, Desa di Masa Lalu, Masa Kini dan bagaimana Masa Depannya, Jurnal MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta
Wasistiono, Sadu, 2012. Telaah Kritis Terhadap Rancangan Undang-Undang Desa, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta
Zanibar, Zen, 2012. Pengadilan Desa Menyongsong Keadilan Hukum Masa Depan, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta

UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa
UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
UU Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1979 Tentang Pemerintahan Desa