The Impact of Pay Reform on the Organizational Performance (A Case Study: Implementation of Remuneration at Universitas Padjadjaran)

  • Ira Irawati Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Nunung Runiawati Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Imanudin Kudus Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran

Abstract

Unpad needs a new payment system as the demand in improving the performance and legality of compensation payment based on the level of responsibility and the needed demand of professionalism. By proposing the principle of pay for performance, since 2015 Unpad has conducted pay reform known as remuneration. Meanwhile, the purpose of remuneration system at Unpad is to obtain human resources with the appropriate qualification so that it makes sure that they work professionally, retains good and high achieving employees, motivates employees to work productively, gives rewards to employees based on their performance and work achievements, and controls the employee cost. This paper would explain how pay reform affects the performance of Unpad, particularly in achieving tridharma perguruan tinggi (the three obligations of universities). The research method applied was the qualitative with collection data techniques of participatory observation, interviews, and literatur review. The research result showed that the implementation of pay reform which has been conducted by Unpad since 2015 has a significant impact on the improvement of organizational performance, especially tridharma perguruan tinggi (the three obligations of universities). It is because besides the principle of pay for performance, the implementation of remuneration also refers to the principle of pay for position and pay for people.

References

Atkinson, M. M., Fulton, M. and Kim, B. (2014), Why do governments use pay for performance? Contrasting theories and interview evidence. Can Public Admin, 57: 436–458. doi:10.1111/capa.12079

Berman, Evan M. (2010). Human Resources Management in Public Service. Sage Publications, Inc.

Cornish, G. and Adams, G. (1993), Trends in Remuneration: The Concept of ‘Total Quality Pay’. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 31: 75–86. doi:10.1177/103841119303100208

Dessler, Gary., Tan Chwee Huat. (2009). Human Resource Management. Jurong: Prentice Hall

Doucouliagos, H., Haman, J. and Stanley, T.D. (2012), Pay for Performance and Corporate Governance Reform. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 51: 670–703. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2012.00695.x

Milkovich, George T et al. (2011). Compensation. McGraw-Hill: Singapore.

Schuler, R. S. and Jackson, S. E. (1988), Linking Remuneration Practices to Innovation as a Competitive Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 26: 6–20. doi:10.1177/103841118802600201

Stone, Raymond J. (2008). Human Resource Management. Milton Qld: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

Vroom, Victor H. (1964). Work Motivation. New York: Wiley

Published
2017-12-01
How to Cite
Irawati, I., Runiawati, N., & Kudus, I. (2017). The Impact of Pay Reform on the Organizational Performance (A Case Study: Implementation of Remuneration at Universitas Padjadjaran). Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 43(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v43i2.71
Section
Articles